How to issue car coupons?

Just as the "fire" began for no reason at the beginning of the year, the Chinese auto market in June also "cold" for no reason, and was "cold" very thoroughly, with no buffer period in between. Many dealers are complaining: Once on June 1, the enthusiasm of quasi-car buyers disappeared as if they had never existed. Although June and July are the traditional off-season sales, this year's off-season is a bit unusual. According to the dealer's original words, it is "a bit too light".

Price reduction promotion, promotion of new models, this is the approach of dealers and depots to cope with the off-season, however, these two kinds of tricks are also invalid this year, these status quo show that the beginning of the year by "1.6L following purchase tax halved." The car-buying frenzy triggered by the policy has subsided, and if there is no follow-up stimulus policy, the auto market is likely to enter the “off-season” of “the strongest in history”.

From the author's point of view, the most effective policy to stimulate the auto market is the local government to issue car coupons. Car vouchers can be used as cash at the time of car purchase. Of course, restrictions can be imposed on the car vouchers, such as the limited displacement of 2.4L or less, valid until December 31st, and so on. If so, the auto market will heat up. In fact, ordinary people do not have no money in their hands, but they are watching. The purchase of car coupons will trigger their enthusiasm and serve as a "pharmaceutical lead." Do not underestimate the attraction of cars to ordinary people. In the hearts of ordinary people, cars are second only to what the house most wants to have.

Moreover, the issuance of vehicle vouchers is not just a matter of promoting sales. It also represents the government’s concern and support for the auto market and can increase the confidence of the people in the auto market in China. What is the most important in the current financial crisis? Confidence is the most important!

Some people say that the government should provide a series of support for car companies to provide loans, tax relief, and even encourage car companies to carry out overseas mergers and acquisitions, but if there is no strong domestic market, all this is the water in the moon, in the mirror. The issuance of vehicle vouchers will enable car manufacturers to maximize their production lines. The cars produced can be sold as soon as possible, and they can be put into production after profits are generated. A virtuous circle is formed. This is the greatest support. (Zhou Weili)

The more you give, the more you have to

After the country implemented a policy of halving the purchase tax for cars under 1.6L at the beginning of the year, it greatly stimulated the market for small-displacement models. In the first half of the year, almost all manufacturers that produced 1.6L displacement models earned a lot of money. . This does not, do not know whether the country really intends to stimulate the market to stimulate large displacement models, or some people with ulterior motives to release smoke bombs, there is news that the purchase tax exemption policy models will expand the range of 2.0L.

This sounds like good news. But what I would like to ask is: Next, will the scope of the exemption be extended to 2.4L? 3.0L? Even after Sichuan Tengzhong “successfully” acquired the oil tiger Hummer, in order to stimulate everyone to help the poor Americans, further expand the policy to 5 hl?

Obviously, if the country really expands the range of vehicle models for the purchase tax relief policy, it will make the auto market into a vicious circle. In fact, plainly, people have greed. When giving the first sweetness, it's easy to feel satisfied with the beauty of giant sweetness and beauty. But if there is no demand, suddenly there will be a greater sweetness, people will think that everything is too easy, it is easy to have desire, always feel that it seems that there is not enough, it seems to give more. Then, on the issue of reducing the exemption of purchase tax vehicle models, it is certainly a bottomless pit. The country can't fill it!

In addition, the reason why the state originally proposed to introduce a tax reduction policy for the following 1.6L models was based on the principle of “implementing small-displacement vehicles for energy conservation and environmental protection”. Now that the scope has been extended to 2.0L, is it not their own mouth?

Of course, some people said that due to the poor performance of mid-to-high-class passenger vehicles and the weakness of commercial vehicles, the increase in production of auto companies will not increase, and the country will need to “save the market”! But if you use this method to save the market, I am afraid there will be more and more places that need remediation. It is easy to make consumers feel that the policy has come too easily by expanding the range of tax rebates for purchase tax rebates. It is better to wait and see if there is any new policy.

Perhaps first clarifying the point of view and then formulating policies is a relatively feasible path. If you want to "energy-saving emission reduction," do not use repeated methods to stimulate the sales of large-displacement models, if you want to save the "middle and advanced passenger cars, commercial vehicles," the city, we must think of a set of policies for these models To implement, the right medicine is the king of "helping the wounded"! (Chen Xinxin)

Parking for you is to take care of you!

Reducing the purchase tax is, in my opinion, a measure to stimulate consumption. It also means that it may be cancelled at any time. This is not the case. Some media quoted a person from the National Development and Reform Commission who was involved in the formulation of the auto industry policy saying that the policy of halving the purchase tax for passenger cars with 1.6 liters and less of emission from January 20 of this year will end by the end of 2009 and will be completed next year. It will no longer be implemented, because the policy of halving the purchase tax is only a "small favor." The main purpose is to boost market confidence. It has achieved the desired results and does not have to extend the deadline.

In my opinion, the purchase tax exemption is not the most important factor for the prospective car owner, and this measure is only an expedient measure. The long-term measure that can actually stimulate the auto market is to improve the car environment. This is certainly not a matter of overnight.

At present, many large cities in China have a poor car environment and the parking issue is the first to bear. At one time, the car was parked in a parking lot near the unit for less than 2 hours, but it was charged for 3 hours. In my opinion, I did not expect the car parker to say: “It was not open to the outside world, but to take care of you. Only let you stop.” Hearing this statement really made me speechless, and it should be God's customer who became a grandson. One night, I went home on a business trip because the community I lived in was not covered by the insurance policy. Therefore, I only had to go to another place to stop, but I turned to several places and said that there was no parking or non-stop outside vehicles. Finally, it was finally 1 km from the community. When I found a parking space somewhere, I even thought of throwing the car under stress.

It is reported that the annual growth rate of Guangzhou's autos is 17%, but the growth rate of parking spaces is only 4% per year. The current parking space gap is very large. For those living in many large cities in the first-tier cities, the main reason why they cannot afford to buy cars is that they cannot afford to raise cars. If we can effectively improve the car environment, I believe that many people are willing to become car owners, which is more effective and lasting than any stimulus measures.

What is the difference between purchase tax incentives and 2.0L emissions?

The news that the range of vehicle purchase tax models have been expanded to 2.0L has not yet been confirmed, and it has caused widespread controversy in the industry. The pros have it and the opponents have it. The reasons for the opposition are also the following two: It is worried that the expansion of the scope of tax incentives may lead to further reductions in national fiscal revenue. The second is that the purchase of 1.8- and 2.0-liter vehicles is also subject to purchase tax concessions, which does not meet the general direction of national energy conservation and environmental protection.

On the surface, these two major reasons are quite reasonable. The reason why this policy is still at the stage of rumors is still estimated to be related to these two major reasons. However, in my opinion, these two major reasons are not enough. It is completely against us to expand the range of purchase tax incentives to 2.0 liters of cars.

First of all, the expansion of the scope of automobile purchase tax concessions may indeed have an impact on the already-reduced state fiscal revenue in 2009. However, we should take into account the backdrop of the great era of further boosting domestic demand and smooth and rapid adoption of the financial crisis. The policy of semi-levying auto purchase tax has tremendous effect on the auto market and domestic demand. We have already seen results in models with 1.6 liters or less of displacement. This policy is very strong in stimulating the market. Now, it is still us to stimulate domestic demand. As soon as possible, we must step out of the first priority of the financial crisis, and as long as the state's fiscal revenue is still within the range that we can afford, we can make preferential treatment on the automobile purchase tax, and it is worthwhile to properly benefit the people.

Secondly, the inclusion of 1.8-liter and 2.0-liter vehicles in the range of purchase tax concessions is contrary to the national principle of energy conservation and environmental protection. This is indeed a false proposition. In countries such as Europe, the United States, Japan, and other automobile consumers, the country implements stringent automobile fuel limits, the state imposes more stringent standards on automobile emissions, and it also includes the promotion of consumption concessions for new energy vehicles. The field advocates an important means of environmental protection and energy conservation. Now, we are making a big fuss about a preferential tax policy that benefits the people. It is actually somewhat tangled up. We may wish to take a look back. We have strictly limited the purchase tax concessions to 1.6 liters or less, and have the effect of energy conservation and environmental protection? Are these small-displacement vehicles the energy-saving and environmentally-friendly models we are looking for? Their technical level and emission standards include interior and exterior design. Are we looking for an exquisite trolley? I don't think so.

In my opinion, the 2.0-liter displacement car is also included in the scope of tax incentives, that is, the logic of not saving energy and not environmental protection, and some similar to the recent hot discussion "increases the personal income tax levy standard to 5,000 yuan, the largest The beneficiaries are the rich instead of the middle-income, so the personal income tax should not be improved. I am only surprised that since these models are neither energy-efficient nor environmentally friendly, why did the country not cut it down and directly banned production of cars with displacements of 2.0L or more? So we are not going more completely on the road of energy saving and environmental protection?